x-mas-tree.png

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ich wünsche allen Freunden und Lesern schöne Weihnachten und ein schönes neues Jahr 2018! Vielen Dank für das Interesse und die Unterstützung in 2017! Mögen alle Hoffnungen in Erfüllung gehen und sich alle Befürchtungen nicht bewahrheiten. Ihr Gerhard Wisnewski

GW unterstuetzen!

untersttzen.gif

Bitte um Unterstuetzung!

Konto
DE83 7015 0000 0098 1348 36
SSKMDEMMXXX
Summe

vvv 2016 Buchvorstellung

Diese E-Mail-Adresse ist gegen Spam-Bots geschützt, Sie müssen Javascript aktivieren, damit Sie es sehen können
The world’s fate is on stake in Syria PDF Drucken E-Mail
Geschrieben von Gerhard Wisnewski   
Thursday, 29. August 2013

by Gerhard Wisnewski

Isn’t this a bit exaggerated? No way! That’s because Syria is the place of the final showdown between east and west, the place, where the claims to power of west and east are concentrated and compressed so much until it all might blow up. Unless one of them might back down.

Baschar al-Assad did use chemical weapons against his own people? Sure. But didn't the USA have always been lying about their potential opponents of war? The sinking of the US-warship Maine 1898 in Havanna, the allegedly surprising assault on the US-Marine base Pearl Harbor by the Japanese in 1941, the alleged attack of Vietnamese speedboats against an american warship in the Golf of Tonkin in 1964 – all these reasons to start a war have more or less been inscenated. Just as untruthful as the homicides of babies by iraqi soldiers in Kuwait (1990), the strikes against the World Trade Center by islamists (2001) or the weapons of mass destruction of Saddam Hussein (2003). And now the head of state in Syria, Baschar al-Assad, is supposed to have used chemical weapons against his own people? Come on.
„Whatever the reason will be to wage a war against Syria and Iran, one thing is for sure“, was said in my yearbook „verheimlicht – vertuscht – vergessen“: „It will be a lie.“

That’s one point. The next is that with this fabricated excuse for war, the tug of war around Syria will go on in the next round. Different from the situation in Libya, Russia and China refused the creation of a no-fly zone this time, which was intended by a western drafted UN-Resolution. After all the no-fly zone in Libya has only been used to neutralise the lybian air force so the country could be bombed unhurriedly. After a wave of staged revolutions in North Africa, it was intended to control the western operated revolution- and coup-barrel finally. Since then it has become pretty clear: The legal way under international law for military action from abroad against Syria is blocked.

The massacre before war

Like I also have mentioned in „verheimlicht-vertuscht-vergessen 2013“ , massacres and assaults on the civil population obtain a central role related to the further escalation. Chronologically the massacre has its place between the intra civil war and the war from the outside. The massacre provokes a emergency situation in which other countries see their right to interfere. As one can see, the massacre transforms the inner civil war into a war from the outside. That’s its function.


Affront against Russia and China


And that’s where we are right now. The chemical assault of August 21, 2013 ist supposed to have been so terrible and Assads fault so strictly proven that there is no other possibility than intervention.  It seems that the only problem is that in this case one would ignore Russia’s clear „Njet“. Russia and China didn’t block every western suggestion concerning Syria for no reason - because those two great powers learned from the Libya case, that such resolutions should just be used for legitimation of assault wars. So, Russia and China fixed a red line. The USA, Great Britain and France shall be stopped in their eastbound proxy wars. But as you can see, the three colonial powers don’t care too much about that line. With their lies about chemical assaults they now want to take the next step to an escalation.

Last exit on the way into global dictatorship

And with this the final question of power arises: Who actually has got the power on the planet?
Will Russia and China just accept an american strike against Syria? And if so: What’s the worth of Russias and Chinas word? And that’s exactly the question: To be specific, if both eastern superpowers can actually afford to give in. On the one hand because of the loss of face in the world, on the other hand because the western revolution barell will roll further against the east- first to Iran, later to Russia and China themselves. Actually it doesn’t seem to exist another way than to stop the west in Syria.
That’s the last option, the last stop on the way into western global dictatorship.

The game with World War III

Exactly because a military reaction of the east is expected, the west follows a salami technique and is now only talking about a limited attack or an action of punishment against Assad. A total Libya-like war and a coup against the Russia-related Assad is verbally expulsed by now, because Washington fears that this could mean the final
Casus belli with Russia. Instead Washington tries to meddle into the area of influence of the East with a limited air raid, without inducing the total escalation. Perhaps it is speculated to weaken the syrian forces, so that the „rebels“ can give them the rest. Probably it is supposed that Russia won’t take this air raid as a reason for a counterstrike, because Russia for sure doesn’t want to ignite World War III because of „some missiles to Damascus“.

In reality the western allys and winners of World War II&I play with the possibility and danger of a third World War. Like in a chess play, the conquest or loss of the planet results from the upcoming moves.

Baschar al-Assad did use chemical weapons against his own people? Sure. But didn't the USA have always been lying about their potential opponents of war? The sinking of the US-warship Maine 1898 in Havanna, the allegedly surprising assault on the US-Marine base Pearl Harbor by the Japanese in 1941, the alleged attack of Vietnamese speedboats against an american warship in the Golf of Tonkin in 1964 – all these reasons to start a war have more or less been inscenated. Just as untruthful as the homicides of babies by iraqi soldiers in Kuwait (1990), the strikes against the World Trade Center by islamists (2001) or the weapons of mass destruction of Saddam Hussein (2003). And now the head of state in Syria, Baschar al-Assad, is supposed to have used chemical weapons against his own people? Come on.
„Whatever the reason will be to wage a war against Syria and Iran, one thing is for sure“, was said in my yearbook „verheimlicht – vertuscht – vergessen“: „It will be a lie.“

That’s one point. The next is that with this fabricated excuse for war, the tug of war around Syria will go on in the next round. Different from the situation in Libya, Russia and China refused the creation of a no-fly zone this time, which was intended by a western drafted UN-Resolution. After all the no-fly zone in Libya has only been used to neutralise the lybian air force so the country could be bombed unhurriedly. After a wave of staged revolutions in North Africa, it was intended to control the western operated revolution- and coup-barrel finally. Since then it has become pretty clear: The legal way under international law for military action from abroad against Syria is blocked.

The massacre before war

Like I also have mentioned in „verheimlicht-vertuscht-vergessen 2013“ , massacres and assaults on the civil population obtain a central role related to the further escalation. Chronologically the massacre has its place between the intra civil war and the war from the outside. The massacre provokes a emergency situation in which other countries see their right to interfere. As one can see, the massacre transforms the inner civil war into a war from the outside. That’s its function.


Affront against Russia and China


And that’s where we are right now. The chemical assault of August 21, 2013 ist supposed to have been so terrible and Assads fault so strictly proven that there is no other possibility than intervention.  It seems that the only problem is that in this case one would ignore Russia’s clear „Njet“. Russia and China didn’t block every western suggestion concerning Syria for no reason - because those two great powers learned from the Libya case, that such resolutions should just be used for legitimation of assault wars. So, Russia and China fixed a red line. The USA, Great Britain and France shall be stopped in their eastbound proxy wars. But as you can see, the three colonial powers don’t care too much about that line. With their lies about chemical assaults they now want to take the next step to an escalation.

Last exit on the way into global dictatorship

And with this the final question of power arises: Who actually has got the power on the planet?
Will Russia and China just accept an american strike against Syria? And if so: What’s the worth of Russias and Chinas word? And that’s exactly the question: To be specific, if both eastern superpowers can actually afford to give in. On the one hand because of the loss of face in the world, on the other hand because the western revolution barell will roll further against the east- first to Iran, later to Russia and China themselves. Actually it doesn’t seem to exist another way than to stop the west in Syria.
That’s the last option, the last stop on the way into western global dictatorship.

The game with World War III

Exactly because a military reaction of the east is expected, the west follows a salami technique and is now only talking about a limited attack or an action of punishment against Assad. A total Libya-like war and a coup against the Russia-related Assad is verbally expulsed by now, because Washington fears that this could mean the final
Casus belli with Russia. Instead Washington tries to meddle into the area of influence of the East with a limited air raid, without inducing the total escalation. Perhaps it is speculated to weaken the syrian forces, so that the „rebels“ can give them the rest. Probably it is supposed that Russia won’t take this air raid as a reason for a counterstrike, because Russia for sure doesn’t want to ignite World War III because of „some missiles to Damascus“.

In reality the western allys and winners of World War II&I play with the possibility and danger of a third World War. Like in a chess play, the conquest or loss of the planet results from the upcoming moves.

 

Original


Because of lack of resources we are only able to provide rough translations here.

Please mail inconsistencies to Diese E-Mail-Adresse ist gegen Spam-Bots geschützt, Sie müssen Javascript aktivieren, damit Sie es sehen können